wooter99

Hi,

That's great to know! Thanks for the update!

I think what I can do for now is the option of exporting partially empty credentials.

• Copy-out credentials from the object,

• Remove the credential from the object, leaving a partially clean one in place (domain),

• Export,

• Re-set credentials.

Hi,

I would like to export my inventory, including the credentials objects, but only their domain.

Use case:

• Person A is part of team P,

• Person A prepares a new custmer folder with their own credentials, which are configured against customer domain ,

• Person A wishes to share the inventory with team P , but exporting with credentials, inclused Person A's username and password, which is not desireable as each team member has their own... However, exporting without credentials, means each member has to manually create the credential object, even though they are all basically the same, including having the same domain, just different username & password ...

Since I would like it to be encrypted in file, I don't imagine I can edit the file itself (the password protected export file), nor would that be the way by which I would like to do that...

Is there a solution for this already in the product? (In any tier?)

If not, I think this would be a good addition.

Hi,

Thanks for info!

For point A. I was not aware of this option before, this works well! Thanks!

For point B. I have opted for templates. This also works well for my needs, again, thanks!

Hi,

Let's say I have a customer folder template (I do) , and it has a custom field with the domain of the customer.

To further streamline the creation of a new customer folder, I would love the ability to have this variable depend on the name of the folder.

Example:

The folder name is called "Some Cust" , the variable is set to let's say "$lower($nospace($NAME$)).lsite" ,

Which results in the variable being set to "somecust.lsite",

Which would in turn cause everything else I put in it to be set correctly (it is all dependand on that for domain).

I don't know if this is already possible somehow, but in case it's not, here's the request...

I was not aware of this! Thanks a lot, this works well for me!

Hi,

That solution did not work for me earlier, but does now... Interestingly enough...

Actually, there is a diff I can point to between attempts. The laptop has since been restarted (whereas before it was "first run" after waking the laptop from hybernation. a lot of resouces were freed)

With that said, I will point to yet another bug, direclty relate dot this, though a minor one, a resolution one.

I'm not sure if it's the rightest thing to do to include it here, but we are more or less on the topic...

Having re-maximized the tab , I decided to semi-minimize it (or whatever it's called, the button that takes it from full screen to small screen, docked),

However, though it docked back, the resolution is completely off. Looks like it's full-screen resolution, but docked.

To resolve it, I switch it to "Work Area", and then minimize again, then dock, and now it's docked, in proper docked-resolution.

EDIT: NOW THE BUG IS BACK!!!

After all I did, minutes passed, and a bit more playing around with the window, the bug where the window is gone and inaccessible is back!!!

Hi,

A. I would love to be able to batch-edit the folder/entry image

B. I would also love being able to setup a rule that says something like "If entry is of type 'A' && has tag '1' then apply THIS image"

(Even just by type would be a start!)

Edit : For the love of whatever god you might believe in, I need this... I have ~2400 entries... Someone save me...

Hi,

When using the "simple"(?) search at the bottom of the navigator tree view, there is no quick and simple way that I could find to search for something that has both tags I'm searching for.

Example:

"Cust A" && "Linux"

I really don't want to go into the advanced search for something that simple...

(Well, simple, from user perspective, of course)

I would like some sort of syntax that will say, "the result MUST have this keyword in the searched fields" ,

Like with Google's use of quotation marks.

I wouldn't mind at all if this functionality was limited to tags though.

Perhaps tapping the magnifying glass could switch to a "tag search" mode in which tags can be entered with comma delimitation?

Or perhaps in a +tag / -tag format?

Example: (ignore quotation marks, it's just for writing the example)

"+CustA +Linux -Ubuntu" , would make it so only entries with tags "CustA" , "Linux" , and "Ubuntu", would be returned.

Bonus points for extra syntax for folder, mixed on, so tag search could be limited to results within a folder, example:

"/CustA +Linux -Ubuntu" .

Edit : It's also worth noting that, as I have now tried it, the advanced search is... Not really very advanced...

The confitiona are all always "OR"ed with eachother, instead of the user choosing if it's "OR" or "AND" ...

Hi,

I am on latest, 2025.2.14.0 , can confirm there is still an issue with minimized RDP sessions becoming inaccessible. (using dynamic resolution , win 11)

Recreate:

• Open an RDP session docked,

• Switch to full screen,

• Minimize,

• The RDP session is now not directly accessible.

To restore:

• Switch to Working Area,

• Dock

The behaviour repeats consistantly.

Fantastic! That did the trick! Thanks!

Indeed, I am on version 2025.2.14.0

Hi,

I am already running that version.

Hi,

I'm running this locally, with a local DB, on a rather strong i9 based workstation laptop. (Win11, NVME SSD)

But I find the performance extremely lacking, compared to working with msmtp directly (ssh appears to be fine).

I also find that same significant performance problem (perhaps even worse) when handling entries, especially a large number of them in a batch.

What could affect this performance, what could be done to improve it?

Thanks.

I am ware that Windows RDP (msmtp) triggers a re-connection to adjust screen size of the session, but,

Is there really no way to circumvent that?

I find it incredebly annoying to have to re-connect a session just to change the session's screen size.

There are cases where I strongly prefer working with RDP as a tab, typically, when I'm only connected to the server for a short task, or when I need to do a similar task in multiple servers, but there are likewise cases where I strongly prefer having it set to "working area" and have my entire monitor be of use to the session, typically, when I'm doing a lot of complicated and lenghty work on one server.

Hi,

Let's say I create "Site A", and it has a sub folder "Common Domain Credentials" with "Domain A" in a custom field of the "Site A folder" used by the credentials.

I then add "Entry A" and it is set to linked credentials -- prompt -- from folder "Common Domain Credentials".

If I than duplicate "Site A" into "Site B" , the entry "Entry A" will -- prompt -- as intended, BUT, the source folder will be the cred directory under "Site A" parent folder, instead of "Site B" parent folder.

Can we have that linking be dynamic, such that when we use "duplicate" on the parent folder, it points to the (correct) duplicated sub-folder that resides under the (correct) duplicated parent folder?

Hi,

Solo (I am not yet willing to recommend this to my team) , the local sqlite(I believe) datasource.

I will continue to use this, if I like it enough, I will recommend it to the TL, and we'll see if that catches on or not, and then if it does, move forward accordingly.

(Which is why this is a private spam-email account, but heck, if I grow to like it, even if the TL rejects it, I wouldn't mind paying the solo-sub for it. Just not in it's current iteration.)

For now, sorting is but one of my pains.

Hi,

The current sorting method where you manually assign a numeric value to each individual entry is nice for your small home lab with 3 servers, but when you're managing dozens of systems with several dozen servers each, this is not really practical.

I need to be able to just drag-drop them into their relative place in the list.

Hell, I wouldn't even mind if this was behind a pay wall... But right now this app still feels like it was made for sysadmin amatuers and not professionals. It's a small wonder RemoteNG is still more popular, despite being objectively worse.

(Edit : Also, I think it's high time it has not just drag-and-drop manual sorting, but auto-sorting based on a set of user-inputted rules such as "software folders first, then customers, then entries, then sites" , or "folders with 'PROD' before 'DR' , before 'TEST'" , etc...)