RDM for teams info (asset management, licensing)
Hello Kelly,
Thank you for your clarification, that helped a lot regarding vault structure, permissions and DVLS licensing model.
I don’t want to be pushy, but I’d really like to properly understand the asset management capabilities before moving forward.
Do you consider RDM + Devolutions Server suitable to be used as the main system for license and asset management? My goal is to avoid using a second platform and keep everything in one place.
If RDM is not designed to fully replace tools like ITFlow, would you recommend integrating it with another system?
Also, just to confirm: using Azure AD (Entra ID) via SAML with Devolutions Server — without on-prem AD — is fully supported, correct?
Thank you again for your help.
RDM for teams info (asset management, licensing)
Hello guys,
I’ve been using RDM Free for years and I’m very happy with it. I’m now testing RDM for Teams with Devolutions Server (trial) because I want to centralize everything into a single source of truth.
My goal is a 2-user setup:
User 1 (technical) – connections, devices, infrastructure
User 2 (non-technical) – strictly license & asset management
For the second user I only need:
Create and edit license entries
Track expiration dates
Receive expiration notifications
No access to remote sessions, credentials, or infrastructure
My idea is:
Separate vaults per client
License entries kept separate from device entries
Permissions configured so the second user only sees/manages licenses
Previously I used ITFlow for license tracking, which worked perfect, but required duplicating data across two systems. I’d like RDM to handle everything in one place.
I’d appreciate clarification on a few things:
Is RDM Teams + Devolutions Server a good fit for this kind of separation (technical vs restricted license-only user)?
Is my approach (separate vaults + separate license entries + granular permissions) the right way to design this?
I’ve read in some places that Devolutions Server might be limited to a single user in the future. Can someone confirm if this is accurate?
If that limitation exists, what would be the recommended alternative within RDM Teams for a 2-user setup like this (SQL data source, Devolutions Hub, other architecture)?
If RDM is not ideal as a standalone asset platform, are there recommended ways to integrate it with another system (similar to ITFlow) or do you suggest a different approach altogether?
I want to make sure the architecture is clean and future-proof before purchasing licenses.
Thank you!