Unexpected folder creation from Bitwarden Synchronization process

Unexpected folder creation from Bitwarden Synchronization process

avatar

Issue: Bitwarden folders are interspersed within a synced collection.

Here is an example to illustrate the unexpected behavior. Here is my test Bitwarden vault and collection structure:

RDM-sync-issue_example-bitwarden-structure.jpg
There is one entry in "Vault Folder 1" which is "Security Camera 1". There is also one entry in "Vault Folder 2" which is "Security Camera 2". There is a "Security Camera 3" which is not in any vault folder. All three security cameras are members of the collection "Security Cameras" which is nested underneath the "Default Collection".

Other Bitwarden items exist under "Default Collection", but I do not want them to sync with my RDM vault.

Here is a screen shot of my Bitwarden test vault with the Default Collection selected.

RDM-sync-issue_example-bitwarden-default-collection.jpg
Here is a screen shot of my Bitwarden test vault this time with the Security Camera collection selected.

RDM-sync-issue_example-bitwarden-security-camera-collection.jpg
On the general tab of the Bitwarden Synchronizer I select a specific destination folder. On the filter tab of the Bitwarden Synchronizer, I select the "Security Cameras" collection like the image below. The setting "Synchronize automatically" is unchecked. Note that "Default Collection" has been touched to change it from being a blue check mark to just being an open blue box to prevent entries other than those under "Security Cameras" from being synced.

RDM-sync-issue_example-filter-tab-selections.jpgThe filter is saved.

When I click the Synchronize button this is the sync result.

RDM-sync-issue_example-sync-result-dialog.jpg
I was not expecting "Vault Folder 1" or "Vault Folder 2" to be in the above list. Below is the resulting hierarchy in my RDM vault.

RDM-sync-issue_example-sync-result-RDM-vault-hierarchy.jpg
Bitwarden folders and collections are separate things. I was not expecting to see Bitwarden folders interspersed within the "Security Cameras" collection. Especially since I did not select any vault folders on the filters tab.

The expected result was that I would see only the three security camera credential objects directly under the "Security Cameras" folder. No vault folders would be created.

I am using RDM version 2026.2.14.0 64-bit (JIT).

RDM-sync-issue_example-bitwarden-structure.jpg

RDM-sync-issue_example-bitwarden-default-collection.jpg

RDM-sync-issue_example-bitwarden-security-camera-collection.jpg

RDM-sync-issue_example-filter-tab-selections.jpg

RDM-sync-issue_example-sync-result-dialog.jpg

RDM-sync-issue_example-sync-result-RDM-vault-hierarchy.jpg

All Comments (6)

avatar

Bump.

avatar

Hello,

Thank you for reaching out regarding this matter, and thank you for providing such a detailed report.

I'll need to set up a similar environment on my end to reproduce the issue. Once I've been able to replicate it, I'll report the behavior to our development team for further investigation.

Could you please confirm the workspace type you're using in Remote Desktop Manager (RDM), along with its version? This information will help me accurately reproduce your setup.

I look forward to your reply.

Best regards,

Jacob Lafrenière

avatar
Hello,

Thank you for reaching out regarding this matter, and thank you for providing such a detailed report.

I'll need to set up a similar environment on my end to reproduce the issue. Once I've been able to replicate it, I'll report the behavior to our development team for further investigation.

Could you please confirm the workspace type you're using in Remote Desktop Manager (RDM), along with its version? This information will help me accurately reproduce your setup.

I look forward to your reply.

Best regards,


@Jacob Lafrenière
I am using the default workspace in RDM for Windows 2026.2.16.0 64-bit (JIT).

avatar

Hello,

Thank you for the follow-up.

I tested this behavior extensively across multiple workspace types but was not able to reproduce the issue consistently. I was able to reproduce it the first time I synchronized BitWarden. However, after launching my recording tool, I was no longer able to reproduce the issue on any workspace type.

Could you let me know if the issue still occurs after deleting the BitWarden folder structure and synchronizing the workspace again?

I also tested the behavior using RDM 2026.2.16.0, and I was unable to reproduce the issue there either. If you have not already done so, it would be worthwhile to update to this version and test whether the issue persists.

I look forward to your reply.

Best regards,

Jacob Lafrenière

avatar
Hello,

Thank you for the follow-up.

I tested this behavior extensively across multiple workspace types but was not able to reproduce the issue consistently. I was able to reproduce it the first time I synchronized BitWarden. However, after launching my recording tool, I was no longer able to reproduce the issue on any workspace type.

Could you let me know if the issue still occurs after deleting the BitWarden folder structure and synchronizing the workspace again?

I also tested the behavior using RDM 2026.2.16.0, and I was unable to reproduce the issue there either. If you have not already done so, it would be worthwhile to update to this version and test whether the issue persists.

I look forward to your reply.

Best regards,


@Jacob Lafrenière
I upgraded to 2026.2.16.0 64-bit (JIT) and I am still able to reproduce this issue at will when deleting the synced hierarchy structure in Remote Desktop Manager between synchronization attempts. I am using the Local (SQLite) workspace.

avatar

Hello,

Thank you for the follow-up.

I looked into this further and found that groups are also interpreted as folders, resulting in an additional folder layer being created directly in RDM. If both All Folders and All Groups are selected in the Filter tab of the Bitwarden Synchronizer entry, it creates a large number of duplicated folders and entry shortcuts.

I will report this on my end, as I believe this is not the intended behavior.

I will follow up here once the development team has either resolved the issue or added a setting that allows you to choose whether groups should be interpreted as folders.

Thank you for your patience.
Best regards,

Jacob Lafrenière