http://forum.devolutions.net/forum/topic399-ssh-port-forwarding.aspx DEVOLUTIONS - Remote Desktop Manager - Bug Report - SSH Port Forwarding - Messages en-us http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Jitbit AspNetForum Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:31:41 GMT Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:31:41 GMT http://forum.devolutions.net/forum/topic399-ssh-port-forwarding.aspx edited by sbonilla on 2/13/2010]]> Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:31:41 GMT http://forum.devolutions.net/forum/topic399-ssh-port-forwarding.aspx
another option for me is to break apart the sessions... forwarding ~40 ports at a time and having my radmin connections point to the appropriate session. For the sake of end-user simplicity, this might be a better way to go for me.

I'll definitely play with the command line session option, I didn't pay much attention to that...]]> Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:52:15 GMT http://forum.devolutions.net/forum/topic399-ssh-port-forwarding.aspx You're right, it seems to be a bug in Putty, maybe you should use Tunnelier with a command line session type ?

David Hervieux
Devolutions inc.]]> Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:50:03 GMT http://forum.devolutions.net/forum/topic399-ssh-port-forwarding.aspx
When trying to connect to Radmin clients behind a server running SSH, in the past I would use Tunnelier (great SSH client BTW) to forward ports to the appropriate machines.

I.E.:
127.0.0.1:50001 --> 192.168.0.1:4899
127.0.0.1:50002 --> 192.168.0.2:4899
...
127.0.0.1:50125 --> 192.168.0.125:4899

etc.etc.

So, I created these forwards for the whole subnet of 192.168.0.1-255, using ports 50001-50255, and when trying to connect through PuTTY with Remote Desktop Manager, I would just get a connection failed message.
I started removing port forwarding rules until I had about 5, which resulted in a "Out of space for port forwardings" message with PuTTY. I googled that and found this:

http://the.earth.li/~sgtatham/putty/0.60/htmldoc/Chapter10.html#errors-portfwd-space

This will be quite a hindrance for me. Hopefully we will see an update for that from PuTTY in the near future, although it looks like this hasn't been touched since 2004.]]> Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:18:54 GMT