literally what it says on the title.
if you restrict wayk to only act as server, it goes small, so far so obvious, but apparently it still displays both banner images, which does not look pretty when they are transparent.
Hi My1,
I'm not so sure I understand, can you post a screenshot of what does not look pretty when Wayk Now is restricted to work only as a server?
Best regards,
Marc-André Moreau
done on both win8.1 (my PC) and a freshly installed windows 10.
apparently restricting as client does the same.
(screens removed for privacy)
Hello
Thanks for the screenshot.
I've entered a ticket for this internally and it will be fixed in an upcoming release. I'll post back here with an update on that!
Thanks again and kind regards,
Richard Markievicz
no idea whether or not it might be a good idea but maybe a seperate image could be used on the mini client, as on the normal client the images are supposed to be together which might make the image look worse or lose meaning when removing the other half.
Hello
Yes - I'm not sure what approach we'll take currently but that is a good suggestion.
The problem as you say is that it's possible to use 2 images to form one complete banner. So we'll either have to ask an alternative image in this case, or scale the provided images down (but this will mean reducing the height on the banner and might look odd).
Thanks and kind regards,
Richard Markievicz
Hello
A brief update on this - the next release of Wayk Now contains a fix for this issue. In "mini client" (i.e. sharer or sharee only) mode, we're scaling the entire banner down by 50%. It makes the banner much smaller but removes the need to supply alternative resources for that case. We might revisit that in the future, but for now, things will look better.
I'll post back here once that update is available. Thanks and kind regards,
Richard Markievicz
Hello
Wayk Now 2020.2.1 will be released later this afternoon and contains the fix outlined in my previous post. Please don't hesitate to post back with further questions or feedback.
Thanks and kind regards,
Richard Markievicz